Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Yeah, Right...

The “Allowed” Thieves Are Still Free, You Still “Allow” Their Freedom.
Because The Corporatist War-profiteers, And The Banker-Thieves, Know They’ve “Won.”

  -  “Let's Get It Back”
      Corporatist tax dogers use the Cayman Islands, they are parasites
      that weaken the United States and other developed nations - They
      must be brought to justice, our government must be forced to do it.

  -  They Oughtta To Be Ashamed, But They Aren’t.
      Lobbyists for large companies – and polluters – like Shell, Boeing,
      3M and Chevron are signing up at a rate of one per day.

  -  Again - Can't Say We Weren’t Warned...
      The “Allowing” May Possibly Not Be “Allowed” To Stop.
 Your Right

“As long as the greatest crime of the 21st century remains unprosecuted,
we all...  can only blame ourselves, and deserve our collective fates.”


= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =  <  B e l o w  T h e  F o l d  >  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

A“Below The Fold” bonus Article - Speaking of damage already done...  That you did allow...

[Reprised in case you missed it, or forgot about the ongoing “allowed” wealth-transfer.]

EFCA Setbacks: A Familiar Story of Corporate Power vs. The Middle Class

by Amy Traub, via DMI Blog, April 23, 2009


The Employee Free Choice Act is key to rebuilding the American middle classnews of Senators wavering in their support for the bill revalidates a key truth about Congress: the main stumbling block to strengthening and expanding the middle class is corporate power.

The same pattern emerges every year on TheMiddleClass.org.  Throughout the year, DMI uses the site to share analysis about the impact of Congressional legislation on Americans’ ability to gain – and hold onto – a middle-class standard of living.  Once a year, we take a step back and look at the big picture.  It often looks depressingly familiar: fiscal conservatives notwithstanding, Congress does fairly well when it comes to measures that simply involve spending more, but falls short – often far short – when powerful corporate interests clash with the wellbeing of the nation’s current and aspiring middle class.

In 2008, for example, Congress stood up for the middle-class on issues like providing more funds to higher education and passing a consumer safety bill that’s even been endorsed by the industry its regulating.  Virtually all Democrats voted for these bills, and most Republicans as well. Similarly in 2007, college aid did well and majorities from both parties in the House voted for common sense contracting reforms.

But Congressional support for middle-class Americans falls off precipitously as soon as major corporate interests are at stake.

In 2007, the Peru trade bill was the skunk at the garden party, provoking 64 percent of Senate Democrats and 48 percent of House Democrats (along with nearly every Republican) to vote for multinational corporations and large investors at the expense of their middle-class constituents.  Last year, it was a willingness to put banks before struggling homeowners, telecommunications companies before consumers, and those @%$& banks again before taxpayers.  These weren’t the only policy disappointments of the year for middle-class Americans, but they were the main cases where significant numbers of Democrats joined nearly all Republicans in selling out the middle class.

This year, I fear Thomas Frank is right when he predicts the same fate for EFCA. Sure, Congress will approve health coverage for low-income kids (an important boost for aspiring middle-class families in its own right) but when it comes to standing up for middle-class Americans against a full-scale corporate lobbying campaign, Congress may not have the guts.  That's terrible news for the middle class.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home